perf pmu: Move pmu__find_core_pmu() to pmus.c

pmu__find_core_pmu() more logically belongs in pmus.c because it
iterates over all PMUs, so move it to pmus.c

At the same time rename it to perf_pmus__find_core_pmu() to match the
naming convention in this file.

list_prepare_entry() can't be used in perf_pmus__scan_core() anymore now
that it's called from the same compilation unit. This is with -O2
(specifically -O1 -ftree-vrp -finline-functions
-finline-small-functions) which allow the bounds of the array
access to be determined at compile time. list_prepare_entry() subtracts
the offset of the 'list' member in struct perf_pmu from &core_pmus,
which isn't a struct perf_pmu. The compiler sees that pmu results in
&core_pmus - 8 and refuses to compile. At runtime this works because
list_for_each_entry_continue() always adds the offset back again before
dereferencing ->next, but it's technically undefined behavior. With
-fsanitize=undefined an additional warning is generated.

Using list_first_entry_or_null() to get the first entry here avoids
doing &core_pmus - 8 but has the same result and fixes both the compile
warning and the undefined behavior warning. There are other uses of
list_prepare_entry() in pmus.c, but the compiler doesn't seem to be
able to see that they can also be called with &core_pmus, so I won't
change any at this time.

Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Haixin Yu <yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913153355.138331-2-james.clark@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>