UPSTREAM: mm: refactor folio_undo_large_rmappable()

commit 593a10da upstream.

Folios of order <= 1 are not in deferred list, the check of order is added
into folio_undo_large_rmappable() from commit 8897277a ("mm: support
order-1 folios in the page cache"), but there is a repeated check for
small folio (order 0) during each call of the
folio_undo_large_rmappable(), so only keep folio_order() check inside the
function.

In addition, move all the checks into header file to save a function call
for non-large-rmappable or empty deferred_list folio.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240521130315.46072-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com


Change-Id: I1d9811de36061b7df2cab9589e6bb5d6237d73fd
Bug: 396611526
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[ Upstream commit itself does not apply cleanly, because there
  are fewer calls to folio_undo_large_rmappable() in this tree. ]
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit eb6b6d3e)
Signed-off-by: yan Chang <changyan1@xiaomi.com>