overflow: Fix direct struct member initialization in _DEFINE_FLEX()
[ Upstream commit 47e36ed7 ] Currently, to statically initialize the struct members of the `type` object created by _DEFINE_FLEX(), the internal `obj` member must be explicitly referenced at the call site. See: struct flex { int a; int b; struct foo flex_array[]; }; _DEFINE_FLEX(struct flex, instance, flex_array, FIXED_SIZE, = { .obj = { .a = 0, .b = 1, }, }); This leaks _DEFINE_FLEX() internal implementation details and make the helper harder to use and read. Fix this and allow for a more natural and intuitive C99 init-style: _DEFINE_FLEX(struct flex, instance, flex_array, FIXED_SIZE, = { .a = 0, .b = 1, }); Note that before these changes, the `initializer` argument was optional, but now it's required. Also, update "counter" member initialization in DEFINE_FLEX(). Fixes: 26dd68d2 ("overflow: add DEFINE_FLEX() for on-stack allocs") Signed-off-by:Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/aBQVeyKfLOkO9Yss@kspp Signed-off-by:
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Loading
Please sign in to comment