Commit a44b1334 authored by Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi's avatar Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Committed by Alexei Starovoitov
Browse files

bpf: Allow calling static subprogs while holding a bpf_spin_lock



Currently, calling any helpers, kfuncs, or subprogs except the graph
data structure (lists, rbtrees) API kfuncs while holding a bpf_spin_lock
is not allowed. One of the original motivations of this decision was to
force the BPF programmer's hand into keeping the bpf_spin_lock critical
section small, and to ensure the execution time of the program does not
increase due to lock waiting times. In addition to this, some of the
helpers and kfuncs may be unsafe to call while holding a bpf_spin_lock.

However, when it comes to subprog calls, atleast for static subprogs,
the verifier is able to explore their instructions during verification.
Therefore, it is similar in effect to having the same code inlined into
the critical section. Hence, not allowing static subprog calls in the
bpf_spin_lock critical section is mostly an annoyance that needs to be
worked around, without providing any tangible benefit.

Unlike static subprog calls, global subprog calls are not safe to permit
within the critical section, as the verifier does not explore them
during verification, therefore whether the same lock will be taken
again, or unlocked, cannot be ascertained.

Therefore, allow calling static subprogs within a bpf_spin_lock critical
section, and only reject it in case the subprog linkage is global.

Acked-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240204222349.938118-2-memxor@gmail.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 2d9a925d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment