Commit a2426186 authored by Ryan Roberts's avatar Ryan Roberts Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

sparc/mm: disable preemption in lazy mmu mode

commit a1d416bf upstream.

Since commit 38e0edb1 ("mm/apply_to_range: call pte function with lazy
updates") it's been possible for arch_[enter|leave]_lazy_mmu_mode() to be
called without holding a page table lock (for the kernel mappings case),
and therefore it is possible that preemption may occur while in the lazy
mmu mode.  The Sparc lazy mmu implementation is not robust to preemption
since it stores the lazy mode state in a per-cpu structure and does not
attempt to manage that state on task switch.

Powerpc had the same issue and fixed it by explicitly disabling preemption
in arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() and re-enabling in
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode().  See commit b9ef323e ("powerpc/64s:
Disable preemption in hash lazy mmu mode").

Given Sparc's lazy mmu mode is based on powerpc's, let's fix it in the
same way here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303141542.3371656-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com


Fixes: 38e0edb1 ("mm/apply_to_range: call pte function with lazy updates")
Signed-off-by: default avatarRyan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAndreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Borislav Betkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juegren Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcow (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleinxer <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent cbf865c6
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment