mm, percpu: do not consider sleepable allocations atomic
28307d93 ("percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp context") has fixed a reclaim recursion for scoped GFP_NOFS context. It has done that by avoiding taking pcpu_alloc_mutex. This is a correct solution as the worker context with full GFP_KERNEL allocation/reclaim power and which is using the same lock cannot block the NOFS pcpu_alloc caller. On the other hand this is a very conservative approach that could lead to failures because pcpu_alloc lockless implementation is quite limited. We have a bug report about premature failures when scsi array of 193 devices is scanned. Sometimes (not consistently) the scanning aborts because the iscsid daemon fails to create the queue for a random scsi device during the scan. iscsid itslef is running with PR_SET_IO_FLUSHER set so all allocations from this process context are GFP_NOIO. This in turn makes any pcpu_alloc lockless (without pcpu_alloc_mutex) which leads to pre-mature failures. It has turned out that iscsid has worked around this by dropping PR_SET_IO_FLUSHER (https://github.com/open-iscsi/open-iscsi/pull/382) when scanning host. But we can do better in this case on the kernel side and use pcpu_alloc_mutex for NOIO resp. NOFS constrained allocation scopes too. We just need the WQ worker to never trigger IO/FS reclaim. Achieve that by enforcing scoped GFP_NOIO for the whole execution of pcpu_balance_workfn (this will imply NOFS constrain as well). This will remove the dependency chain and preserve the full allocation power of the pcpu_alloc call. While at it make is_atomic really test for blockable allocations. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250206122633.167896-1-mhocko@kernel.org Fixes: 28307d93 ("percpu: make pcpu_alloc() aware of current gfp context") Signed-off-by:Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Loading
Please sign in to comment