Commit 8cf7fef1 authored by Gang Yan's avatar Gang Yan Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow



commit 443041de upstream.

When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in
'mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow' because subflow_req->msk is NULL.

Call trace:

  mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)
  subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)
  tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)
  tcp_v4_rcv (./net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2268)
  ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207)
  ip_local_deliver_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234)
  ip_local_deliver (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254)
  ip_rcv_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449)
  ...

According to the debug log, the same req received two SYN-ACK in a very
short time, very likely because the client retransmits the syn ack due
to multiple reasons.

Even if the packets are transmitted with a relevant time interval, they
can be processed by the server on different CPUs concurrently). The
'subflow_req->msk' ownership is transferred to the subflow the first,
and there will be a risk of a null pointer dereference here.

This patch fixes this issue by moving the 'subflow_req->msk' under the
`own_req == true` conditional.

Note that the !msk check in subflow_hmac_valid() can be dropped, because
the same check already exists under the own_req mpj branch where the
code has been moved to.

Fixes: 9466a1cc ("mptcp: enable JOIN requests even if cookies are in use")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMatthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250328-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-6-15-v1-1-34161a482a7f@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ Conflict in subflow.c because commit 74c7dfbe ("mptcp: consolidate
  in_opt sub-options fields in a bitmask") is not in this version. The
  conflict is in the context, and the modification can still be applied.
  Note that subflow_add_reset_reason() is not needed here, because the
  related feature is not supported in this version. ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent c964bf65
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment