Commit 85a7e543 authored by David Hildenbrand's avatar David Hildenbrand Committed by Andrew Morton
Browse files

s390/uv: convert gmap_destroy_page() from follow_page() to folio_walk

Let's get rid of another follow_page() user and perform the UV calls under
PTL -- which likely should be fine.

No need for an additional reference while holding the PTL:
uv_destroy_folio() and uv_convert_from_secure_folio() raise the refcount,
so any concurrent make_folio_secure() would see an unexpted reference and
cannot set PG_arch_1 concurrently.

Do we really need a writable PTE?  Likely yes, because the "destroy" part
is, in comparison to the export, a destructive operation.  So we'll keep
the writability check for now.

We'll lose the secretmem check from follow_page().  Likely we don't care
about that here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240802155524.517137-9-david@redhat.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarClaudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 8710f6ed
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment