btrfs: cache folio size and shift in extent_buffer

After the conversion to folio interfaces (but without the patch to
enable larger folio allocation), there is an LTP report about observable
performance drop on metadata heavy operations.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/202312221750.571925bd-oliver.sang@intel.com/



This drop is caused by the extra code of calculating the
folio_size()/folio_shift(), instead of the old hard coded
PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SHIFT.

To slightly reduce the overhead, just cache both folio_size and
folio_shift in extent_buffer.

The two new members (u32 folio_size and u8 folio_shift) are stored
inside the holes of extent_buffer. folio_size is shared with len, which
is reduced to u32. The size of eb does not change.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>