Commit 26b3a8b2 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä
Browse files

drm/i915/dsb: Move the +1 usec adjustment into dsb_wait_usec()



The "wait usec" DSB command doesn't quite seem to able to
guarantee that it always waits at least the specified
amount of usecs. Some of that could be just because it
supposedly just does some kind of dumb timestamp comparison
internally. But I also see cases where two hardware timestamps
sampled on each side of the "wait usec" command come out one
less than expected. So it looks like we always need at least a
+1 to guarantee that we never wait less than specified. Always
apply that adjustment in dsb_wait_usec().

Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com


Reviewed-by: default avatarAnkit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
parent 46e2ffbd
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment