Unverified Commit 144d6dfc authored by Kuninori Morimoto's avatar Kuninori Morimoto Committed by Mark Brown
Browse files

ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_unregister_component() and snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver()



We have below 2 functions, but these are very similar

(A)	snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver()
(B)	snd_soc_unregister_component()

(A)	void snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver(...)
	{
		...

(a)		mutex_lock(&client_mutex);
 ^ (X)		component = snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked(dev, component_driver->name);
 |		if (!component)					   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 |			goto out;
(b)
 |		snd_soc_del_component_unlocked(component);
 v
	out:
(c)		mutex_unlock(&client_mutex);
	}

(B)	void snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver(...)
	{
(a)		mutex_lock(&client_mutex);
 ^		while (1) {
 | (X)			struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked(dev, NULL);
 |												     ^^^^
(b)			if (!component)
 |				break;
 |
 |			snd_soc_del_component_unlocked(component);
 v		}
(c)		mutex_unlock(&client_mutex);
	}

Both are calling lock (a), find component and remove it (b), and
unlock (c). The big diff is whether use driver name for lookup() or
not (X).

Merge these into snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver() (B), and
snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver() (A) can be macro.

Signed-off-by: default avatarKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87h61qy2vn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent 321f9db5
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment