better lockdep annotations for simple_recursive_removal()

[ Upstream commit 2a8061ee ]

We want a class that nests outside of I_MUTEX_NORMAL (for the sake of
callbacks that might want to lock the victim) and inside I_MUTEX_PARENT
(so that a variant of that could be used with parent of the victim
held locked by the caller).

In reality, simple_recursive_removal()
	* never holds two locks at once
	* holds the lock on parent of dentry passed to callback
	* is used only on the trees with fixed topology, so the depths
are not changing.

So the locking order is actually fine.

AFAICS, the best solution is to assign I_MUTEX_CHILD to the locks
grabbed by that thing.

Reported-by:  <syzbot+169de184e9defe7fe709@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>