tests: Improve fdt_resize() tests
We primarily test fdt_resize() in the sw_tree1 testcase, but it has
some deficiencies:
- It didn't check for errors actually originating in fdt_resize(),
just for errors before and after
- It only tested cases where the resized buffer was at the same
address as the original one, whereas fdt_resize() is also supposed
to work if the new buffer is entirely separate, or partly
overlapping
Signed-off-by:
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Loading
Please sign in to comment